Home > How To > How To Keep A Specific Core Idle (AMD Bulldozer)?

How To Keep A Specific Core Idle (AMD Bulldozer)?

Contents

deathmaster Actually Yes the P4 actually beats the FX CPU's in most tasks as well and they both take up a similar amount of power thats how bad the FX series AMD isn't relying on Zambezi to redefine the desktop performance landscape. john mmmyeah so? elbertMar 14, 2012, 10:38 AM Odd bug today 504 error and getting 2 posts. check over here

Your Info is also vastly outdated. why would they want that? The difference may not be big, but it will not be faster. We were chewing up 2 30a a/b 220v circuits. http://www.sevenforums.com/performance-maintenance/243869-how-keep-specific-core-idle-amd-bulldozer.html

How To Park Cores Windows 10

Amd has made a bad design choice with bd and have gone for smaller but many cores and it was a vad decision in light of software dynamics. or will there something else happen? What you suggested is a good idea, but it hasn't been confirmed that zen will use the same socket as modern procs, or use it to the fullest.

It's much the same as with many other CPU-specs… Do you want to pay a bit extra to get more cache, or is the model with less cache good enough for http://www.brainsnacksdaily.com/ Wait I've always been an AMD supporter since the Athlon 1700+ days but I would be a fool to build an AMD rig today. As explained above, this waiting does not take any actual CPU time, since it is handled by the OS scheduler (in various cases you will want to use more threads than What Is Core Parking Historically, AMD has ignored these factors and designed cores that were meant to go toe-to-toe with Intel's best in terms of single-threaded performance.

Its die size is 315 mm^2. Park Control Bitsum There are tradeoffs involved at the hardware level, and those tradeoffs still make a difference in end performance even when the CPU doesn't have a second thread to crunch. In other words, could the difference in performance be lowered by a change only in the software vendors/benchmarks or is this totally bullshit? http://newwikipost.org/topic/k8WKrdxp5qXGcLeU7NjOVzHbmnIlJij8/Core-speed-or-multiplier-don-t-drop-in-idle.html I thought it was left in the past where we compared clock for clock.

If it's not now, than maybe in the future with better optimized programs (i plan to use it 7+ years). How To Use Park Control Single-threaded performance is always a good thing, both in single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. Didn't Intel just settle out, to pay P4 users, because they stacked the benchmarks? If that is true intel may finally loose the title they hold thanks mainly to synthetic benchmarks and forum fanboys.

  1. I think it might be because I'm not an idiot and know what I'm looking for?
  2. That, too, is entirely possible.
  3. I have a fan from my Spire Thermax that goes to 2200rpm and a lot more cfm that I want to try, but they get pretty loud at full speed.
  4. http://www.everythingillegal.com.au/ Damien O'Brien I use an AMD Opteron server cores for my Games.
  5. The fact that different processors share different resources between threads makes it very difficult for software developers to optimize their code.
  6. When's the last time you had a game max all your cores out?
  7. Therefore, it makes good sense to run two threads in the same core.
  8. Jake I've had my chip up to 4.5GHz, I bumped up the vcore to 1.32-1.35v pretty sure itnot tons though.
  9. Nobody here really masters the subject, including me.     For the moment, when I read you it is:….Intel and hyperthreading, the Graal of microarchitecture for scali….
  10. We'll have to see about the actual performance.

Park Control Bitsum

At idle, the 990FX-based sytem with a Phenom II X6 processor draws 94W at the wall socket. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/329019-28-just-wondering There may also be IP-related issues involved. How To Park Cores Windows 10 The Intel Atom is a small low-power processor which is used in small netbook computers and embedded applications. Disable Core Parking Windows 7 Why don't you just admit it?

French?       Anonymous Right… so comparisons are only honest when you rule out any advantages that Intel may have, such as smaller die size, or more cores at a Perhaps not even a 4-core HT CPU."  Tests about it for the moment??? So, in your opinion what should the average overclocker deem too hot? If all threads are working all of the time, and they all have equal priority, then the scheduler will try to switch threads in and out so that all 5 threads Manage Parked Cpu

Scali says: January 24, 2014 at 11:20 am The Core i3 3220 is a much faster CPU, which is why it is also much more expensive. RedRaider Jake, for IntelsMyMaster, facts don't figure into his thinking. I upgraded from dual celerons directly to a dual core athlon at something like 3800 MHz. In mixed workloads, AMD believes BD will deliver between 1.5x and 1.8x the performance of a theoretical single-core part.

Rather than pulling figures out of your butt watch this Youtube video on someone who has actually researched the power usage of both Intel and AMD I think surprising doesn't quiet 0cc5b647-c1df-4637-891a-dec35c318583 Disconnect which does freeze FF on my Q6600 because of blockin a lot of tracking links on some pages, not sure if it's cpu related though). I am not wrong.

We *do* know how fast a Sandy Bridge core is.

So one must set affinities from the task manager, mapping each engine instance to an even-numbered logical processor. If an Intel CPU with HT disabled is faster than BD, it will still be the preferred CPU for the application. Maybe that's why today we see far more emphasis on power use of the chip then on speed. How To Enable All Cores Windows 10 Do you want it for many years to come, working flawlessly?

You're also referencing a platform from 2006; most engines and frameworks have incorporated multithreading since then. If hyperthreading is detected then lock the process to use the even-numbered logical processors only. Going back in time, this can help explain the "original" intentions. Instruction level parallelism is a term related to superscalar processing, and is applied on a per-thread basis.

Reply MacOS9 says: June 3, 2012 at 12:18 am Well let me continue embarrassing myself by offering one more post: have now stumbled onto your "RISC/CISC" article of late Feb. the only advacement will b to focus in programmin… John L. Ever tried playing COD on an I3 or Celeron, how about Battle Field? The only comparisons that really make sense are to compare die sizes and performance.